Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  143 / 146 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 143 / 146 Next Page
Page Background

Education

G.464

BIRTH OF LEDA (LABORATORY FOR EDUCATION IN DOSIMETRY

ANALYSES) IN MEDICAL PHYSICS AND RADIOTHERAPY DEPARTMENTS

G. Compagnone

* , a ,

A.L. Angelini

a ,

R. Vanini

a ,

A. Veraldi

b ,

F. Romani

a ,

E. Fabbri

a ,

S. Domenichell

i a ,

S. Ciabatt

i b ,

A.G. Morgant

i b .

a

UO Fisica Sanitaria,

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy;

b

UO Radioterapia,

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy

Introduction:

In Radiotherapy Departments, radiation oncologist (RO) and

medical physicist (MP) work side by side for patient care: besides other

tasks, the former is responsible for specifying doses to be delivered to the

target and doses limitations to critical organs; the latter holds the respon-

sibility for generation, review and interpretation of treatment plans and

dose distributions. Aim of this work was to describe how an educational

laboratory, for radiotherapy-specific dosimetry studies and analyses, was

organized in collaboration between Medical Physics and Radiotherapy

Departments.

Materials and Methods:

An initial team of 3 MP, 3 RO (1 in training) and

3 dosimetrists was identified to study, not full time, the feasibility and

sustainability of the Laboratory for Education in Dosimetry Analyses (LEDA)

educational project in a large clinical university hospital environment, where

many students are in formation (17 RO and 2 MP). A workstation, where

both the latest and the older versions of the treatment planning system

were installed, was completely dedicated to LEDA. As an example of a pos-

sible study, some treatment plans were revised in order to calculate doses

to organs out of the irradiation fields.

Results:

The expected results are: to calculate doses to normal structures

distant from the clinical target; to evaluate the potential risk of lesions due

to radiotherapy treatments; to improve the knowledge of radiation therapy

physics of students and professionals as a part of continuing education. The

time to be dedicated to LEDA varied depending on the nature of the request:

e.g., in many cases a new critical structure segmentation was required.

Conclusions:

The LEDA project showed its potential and, though some ‘cali-

brations’ are still due, can be proposed as a feasible experiment that can

help both students in training to learn more about the physics of radio-

therapy and the radiotherapy team to revise the dose distributions for a

better care of patients.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.01.474

G.465

THE AIFM WEB SECTION ‘ILFISICOMEDICORISPONDE’ TWO YEARS

FROM THE START: CONSIDERATIONS, CRITICAL POINTS AND FUTURE

DEVELOPMENTS

S. Delle Canne *

, a ,

L. Bianchi

b .

a

Ospedale San Giovanni Calibita

Fatebenefratelli-Isola Tiberina, Roma, Italy;

b

A.O. Ospedale di Circolo di Busto

Arsizio, Busto Arsizio, Italy

Introduction:

The AIFM project ‘ilfisicomedicorisponde’ started in 2013, to

render a service of scientific and usable information to non-experts in the

field of radiation risk, both medical and environmental. Local and national

mass media have contributed to its spread among people but

margins for better dissemination are certainly wider. Interest in the project

from other associations that pursue the goal of accurate information

potentially creates a network of virtuous collaborations. After two years, the

activity is evaluated to improve the project and to frame issues emerged.

Materials and Methods:

In line with ICRP and IAEA, the AIFM has felt the

need to disseminate scientific information on daily physical phenomena

that, if not well understood, can generate concerns (e.g. risks related to di-

agnostic procedures) or simply curiosity. FAQs prepared by AIFM experts

include medical (radiotherapy, radiology, nuclear medicine) and environ-

mental (nuclear energy, electromagnetic fields, . . .) exposures. An e-mail

address is available to send questions with answer within 10 days. Clini-

cal questions are redirected to medical professionals.

Results:

In two years 50 questions arrived, most concerning about radio-

logical procedures in pregnancy and of children. Great anxiety, often

caused by wrong or misleading information, for induction of tumors or

malformations highlight the need for a greater capacity to disseminate

information to the public. Moreover, requests from some doctor identify

new aims, such as contacts with general practitioners, pediatricians and

gynecologists who have shown interest in being involved in training

programs and divulgation.

Conclusions:

After two years of activity, critical issues analysis (public knowl-

edge of radiation risk in medical exposures very confusing and limited, lack

of institutional local scientific websites, countering a misleading informa-

tion) and future developments (greater collaboration with the clinical

component, in particular radiological) have been identified.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.01.475

G.466

ICTP, TRIESTE UNIVERSITY AND ITALIAN MEDICAL PHYSICS: A TRAINING

OPPORTUNITY FOR YOUNG PHYSICISTS FROM DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

R. Padovani

* , a ,

L. Bertocchi

a ,

R. Longo

b ,

M. De Denaro

c ,

M. Brambilla

d ,

E. Capra

e ,

C. Cavedo

n f ,

P. Francesco

n g ,

H. Hrsak

h ,

M.R. Malisan

i ,

M. Paiusc

o j ,

R. Ropolo

k ,

A. Torresin

l ,

A. Turr

a m ,

A. Valentin

i n .

a

Abdus Salam International

Centre for Theoretical Physics (ICTP), Trieste, Italy;

b

Dept. of Physics & INFN,

Trieste University, Trieste, Italy;

c

Medical Physics Dept, University Hospital,

Trieste, Italy;

d

Medical Physics Dept, University Hospital, Novara, Italy;

e

Medical

Physics Dept, CRO, Aviano (Pn), Italy;

f

Medical Physics Dept, University Hospital,

Verona, Italy;

g

Medical Physics Dept, General Hospital, Vicenza, Italy;

h

Medical

Physics Dept, Oncology Hospital, Zagreb, Croatia;

i

Medical Physics Dept,

University Hospital, Udine, Italy;

j

Medical Physics Dept, IOV, Padova, Italy;

k

Medical Physics Dept, Cittá della salute, Torino, Italy;

l

Medical Physics Dept,

Niguarda Hospital, Milano, Italy;

m

Medical Physics Dept, University Hospital,

Ferrara, Italy;

n

Medical Physics Dept, S. Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy

Introduction:

The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics

(ICTP) and the Trieste University have initiated in 2014 a Master of Ad-

vanced Studies in Medical Physics

( www.ictp.it/programmes/mmp.aspx )

,

a two-years training programme in Medical Physics, co-sponsored by the

Academy of Sciences for the Developing World (TWAS).

The Master Programme is designated to provide young promising gradu-

ates in physics, mainly from developing countries, with a post-graduated

theoretical and clinical training suitable to be recognised as Clinical Medical

Physicist in their countries.

Material and Methods:

Presently, the 3 cycles of the Master’s pro-

gramme has seen 49 participants from 33 countries: Africa (19), Asia (11),

Central and South America (14), and Europe (5), selected among more than

500 applicants. Full or partial scholarships are awarded to successful

candidates from developing countries, thanks to the support of the IAEA,

TWAS, KFAS, IOMP, EFOMP and ICTP.

The Master’s programme has been developed according to the recommenda-

tions of IOMP and IAEA for the education and the clinical training. In the first

year 330 hours of lectures and 230 hours of guided exercises are devoted to:

Anatomy and physiology, Radiobiology, Radiation physics, Radiation dosimetry,

Physica Medica 32 (2016) e138–e139

Contents lists available at

ScienceDirect

Physica Medica

journal homepage:

http://www.physicamedica.com