Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  124 / 146 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 124 / 146 Next Page
Page Background

can be collected with a concentration greater than 1 Bq/g depending on

trash weight, a procedure management of hospital trash from injected pa-

tients has to be established to avoid unsafe disposal of radioactive wastes.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.01.409

D.403

EVALUATION OF MEDICAL RADIATION EXPOSURES IN TUSCANY

S. Ferretti

* , a , b ,

C. Sottocornola

a , c ,

A. Tofan

i b ,

A.C. Traino

c ,

M. Tripodi

a , b .

a

Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita’ di Pisa, Pisa, Italy;

b

Azienda USL1,

Massa-Carrara, Italy;

c

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy

Introduction:

Radiations used in medical applications are the major source

of artificial radiation exposing the population of developed countries. Al-

though the use of ionizing radiations in medicine has originated undeniable

health benefits, this has also led to the necessity of monitoring potential-

ly harmful effects produced by radiations used for diagnostic purposes. These

effects are essentially stochastic. The main side effect produced by radia-

tion is the induction of cancers (solid tumors and leukemia) even after

several years from the exposure.

Legislative Decree 187/2000 requires Italian regions to provide an esti-

mate of medical exposure of their population. The region of Tuscany has

therefore planned (through resolution No. 994 of 11-10-2014) a project

aimed to assess the annual per-capita and collective effective dose due to

medical exposures.

Materials and Methods:

Data were gathered from questionnaires filled out

by technical experts of several hospitals. The collected information in-

cluded exposure and geometric parameters of the specific exam, dosimetric

data, frequency and type of exams involving ionizing radiation for inpa-

tients, etc. The total number of exams carried out in all the hospitals during

a year, classified by type (according to a numerical code) was derived from

a specific regional database. Dedicated software packages were used, when

available, to assess the variability of effective dose for any specific exam.

Results:

We show some preliminary results of effective dose evaluation for

the most important exams with ionizing radiations performed in some hos-

pitals of Tuscany.

Conclusions:

Besides fulfilling legal requirements, this evaluation allows

to compare current data with those of previous surveys, and to outline any

statistically significant trend.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.01.410

D.404

ASSESSMENT OF RADIONUCLIDE IMPURITIES IN

18

F-METIL-CHOLINE

(

18

F-FMECH)

M. Iacco

* , a ,

A. Rongoni

b ,

S. Beneventi

a ,

D. Saetta

c ,

F. Sust

a a ,

P. Sabatini

d ,

M. Marcon

i d ,

R. Tarducci

a .

a

Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, Medical

Physics Department, Perugia, Italy;

b

University of Perugia, Surgery and

Biomedicine Department, Perugia, Italy;

c

Santa Maria della Misericordia

Hospital, Hospital Pharmacy Department, Perugia, Italy;

d

Arpa Umbria, Perugia,

Italy

Introduction:

Radionuclide impurities generated during the bombard-

ment of [

18

O] water in the production of

18

F-Metil-Choline (

18

F-FMeCh) were

assessed using high resolution gamma spectrometry and liquid scintilla-

tion spectrometry. The aim of this work was to determine the distribution

of impurity in the synthesis process and demonstrate the radiochemical

purity of the

18

F-FMeCh.

Materials and methods:

Samples from the different steps of production

process were collected: [

18

O] irradiated water, target’s waste water, Cromafix

cartridge, Cromafix’s waste water, WCX cartridge, final waste water and final

18

F-FMeCh solution. To determine the gamma emitting radionuclides, the

samples were analyzed in a standard calibrated geometry using a High-

Purity Germanium gamma-ray spectrometer (EG&G Ortec). Moreover, we

assessed the activity of beta-emitting

3

H by liquid scintillation counter

(Wallac Quantulus).

Results:

Our data showed the presence of gamma-emitting

51

Cr,

52

Mn,

54

Mn,

56

Co,

57

Co,

58

Co,

95m

Tc,

96

Tc,

109

Cd,

184

Re and

186

Re in the [

18

O] irradiated water.

In the target’s waste water, we found the same radionuclides except for

51

Cr,

95m

Tc and

186

Re. The Cromafix cartridge showed the presence of all the

impurities except for

58

Co, which was found in the Cromafix’s waste water.

The remaining nuclides were found in the final waste water. In the final

18

F-FMeCh solution, the activity was lower of the minimum detectable ac-

tivity (MDA) of the spectrometer. We found the presence of

3

H in [

18

O]

irradiated water. We also assessed the presence of 3H in the final

18

F-

FMeCh solution, where the activity concentration was extremely low

(10

2

Bq/g).

Conclusions:

The data demonstrated that purification methods, adopted

for the synthesis, provide

18

F-FMeCh radionuclidically pure. Moreover the

activity of cartridges and wastes were lower than the exemption limits.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.01.411

D.405

MONTE CARLO ESTIMATION AND MEASUREMENT OF THE ACTIVATION

PRODUCTS DUE TO AN ELECTRON LINEAR ACCELERATOR FOR MEDICAL

APPLICATIONS

L. Isolan

* , a ,

G. Cucchi

a ,

M. Iori

b ,

R. Sghedon

i b ,

M. Sumini

a .

a

University of

Bologna, Bologna, Italy;

b

IRCCS-ASMN Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy

Introduction:

During radiotherapy treatments with high energy electron

sources some nuclear reactions take place. This means that several kinds

of radioisotopes are generated both in the device and then in the treat-

ment chamber walls and some additional dose is given to the patient and

to the staff of the radiotherapy unit, due to the decay processes, often im-

plying gamma-ray emissions. To show these effects a portable NaI(Tl)

monitor is used for gamma spectrometry.

Materials and Methods:

The purpose of this work is to investigate the ac-

tivation products using both Monte Carlo simulations, with the MCNP family

codes, and an experimental measurement setup. The goal is to achieve the

ken of the induced radioactivity with the measures

[1]

and identify the

source components of this with numerical model. To do this, standard cross

section libraries have been expanded and the study of the activation, due

both to photons and photoneutrons, has been done.

Results:

The capability of the MCNPX/6 codes has been tested in terms of

convergence and reliability mainly comparing the results with the ones

coming frommeasurement. Considering the W187 produced in the primary

collimator of the accelerator as the reference isotope of the induced acti-

vation processes (evaluated in the order of 10

6

atoms/electron directly from

photons) we have linked up the Monte Carlo estimations with the exper-

imental analysis carried out also on the bunker wall.

Conclusions:

In conclusion, the capability of MCNPX/6 to model the ac-

tivation induced by an electron accelerator for medical applications, with

the identification of the induced radioactivity, has been fully exploited and

compared with the results obtained by an experimental campaign.

Reference

[1]

Ram R, Steadman I. Determination of activation products and result- ing dose rates for the varian truebeam. In: CRPA 2014 conference. Winnipeg, Canada; 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.01.412

D.406

WHY NOT USE EFFECTIVE DOSE INDEX (EDI) INSTEAD OF EFFECTIVE

DOSE (E) FOR THE INFORMATION RELATING TO PATIENT EXPOSURE?

A. Lazzari *, M. Quattrocchi.

Usl2 Lucca – S.C.Fisica Sanitaria, Lucca, Italy

Introduction:

One of the topics on the transposition of the Directive 2013/

59/EURATOM into Italian law is the choice of the information to be included

in the reports of the patient exposure. We have often argued that the data

to be reported are the dose indexes as PKA, CTDIvol and PKL, CT. Among

the physicians, but not only, many still require the use of the Effective Dose

(E). In the case that the choice falls on E, we propose to use it with the

meaning of an index and so to replace it with a new term Effective Dose

Index (EDI).

Materials and Methods:

The effective dose use in medical imaging is based

on the simplicity of switching to a risk assessment. But we have to take

into account the warnings in ICRP Publication 103 that states that it cannot

be used for the assessment of individual risk in diagnostic radiology.

The reasons are well summarized in the literature and converge in con-

sidering that communication of E to the patient is essentially wrong.

e119

Abstracts/Physica Medica 32 (2016) e116–e123